|
|
A192820
|
|
2-Ramanujan primes: the interval (x/2,x] has at least n Ramanujan primes for x >= a(n) but not for x = a(n) - 1.
|
|
8
|
|
|
11, 41, 59, 97, 149, 151, 227, 229, 233, 239, 263, 307, 367, 373, 401, 409, 569, 571, 587, 593, 599, 641, 643, 647, 653, 719, 751, 821, 937, 941, 1009, 1019, 1021, 1031, 1049, 1051, 1061, 1063, 1217, 1367, 1373, 1423, 1427, 1439, 1481, 1487, 1549, 1553, 1559
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,1
|
|
COMMENTS
|
It is conjectured that primepi(a(n)) <= 7*n for all n. - T. D. Noe, Aug 26 2011
Paksoy (2012) denotes a(n) by R'_n and calls it "the n-th derived Ramanujan prime." He proves the bounds on R'_n below. - Jonathan Sondow, Oct 29 2012
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
FORMULA
|
R(2n) <= a(n) < R(3n), where R(n) = the n-th Ramanujan prime (Paksoy 2012).
p(4n) < a(n) < p(9n), where p(n) = the n-th prime (Paksoy 2012).
a(n) < p(8n) for n >= 5315 (Paksoy 2012).
R(2n) ~ a(n) ~ p(4n) as n -> oo (Paksoy 2012).
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
EXTENSIONS
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|