|
|
A187279
|
|
a(n) is the least number of terms needed to represent n as a sum of powers of the same prime.
|
|
1
|
|
|
1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,6
|
|
COMMENTS
|
A000961 gives all n such that a(n)=1. A024619 gives all n such that a(n) > 1.
If a(n) < m, let p be a prime such that n is a sum of < m powers of p. Then for any positive integers c_1, ... c_m that add up to n, p divides the m-nomial coefficient n!/(c_1!*c_2!*...*c_m!). If a(n) >= m then there is no prime that divides all such coefficients.
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
a(15) = 3 because 15 can be expressed with powers of 3 as 3^2+3^1+3^1, or with powers of 7 as 7^1+7^1+7^0, or with powers of 13 as 13^1+13^0+13^0, but there is no such expression with fewer than three terms.
|
|
MAPLE
|
with(numtheory):
b:= proc(n, p) local c, m; m:=n; c:=0;
while m>0 do c:= c+irem(m, p, 'm') od; c
end:
a:= n-> min(seq(b(n, ithprime(i)), i=1..pi(n+1))):
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
Join[{1}, Table[Min[Plus @@@ IntegerDigits[n, Prime[Range[PrimePi[n]]]]], {n, 2, 110}]] (* T. D. Noe, Mar 08 2011 *)
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn,easy
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|