|
|
A185195
|
|
Least k such that lambda(1) + lambda(2) +...+ lambda(k) >= n.
|
|
1
|
|
|
1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 10, 10, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14, 14, 14, 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 16, 16, 16, 16, 17, 17, 17, 17
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,2
|
|
COMMENTS
|
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
EXAMPLE
|
a(3) = 3 because lambda(1) + lambda(2) + lambda(3) = 1+1+2 > 3.
|
|
MAPLE
|
with(numtheory):for n from 1 to 100 do:ii:=0:for k from 1 to 1000 while(ii=0) do: s:=sum(lambda(i), i=1..k):if s>=n then ii:=1: printf(`%d, `, k):else fi:od:od:
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
a[n_] := (k = 1; While[ Total[ CarmichaelLambda[ Range[k]]] < n, k++]; k); Table[ a[n], {n, 1, 77}]
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|