

A159625


Numbers n such that 2^x + 3^y is never prime when max(x,y) = n


1



1679, 1743, 4980, 4982, 5314, 5513, 5695, 6100, 6578, 7251, 7406, 7642, 8218, 8331, 9475, 9578, 9749, 10735
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)



OFFSET

1,1


COMMENTS

Mark Underwood found that for each nonnegative integer n < 1421 there is at least one prime of the form 2^m + 3^n or 2^n + 3^m with m not exceeding n.
This sequence consists of numbers for which there is no such prime.
David Broadhurst estimated that a fraction in excess of 1/800 of the natural numbers belongs to this sequence and found 17 instances with n < 10^4.
For each of the remaining 9983 nonnegative integers n < 10^4, a prime or probable prime of the form 2^x + 3^y was found with max(x,y) = n.
Each probable prime was subjected to a combination of strong Fermat and strong Lucas tests.


LINKS

Table of n, a(n) for n=1..18.
Underwood's posting in the PrimeNumbers list
Broadhurst's heuristic in the PrimeNumbers list
A list of 9983 primes or probable primes for the excluded cases with n < 10^4


EXAMPLE

a(3) = 4980, since there is no prime of the form 2^m + 3^4980 or 2^4980 + 3^m with m < 4981 and 4980 is the third number n such that 2^x + 3^y is never prime when max(x,y) = n


CROSSREFS

Cf. A159270, A159266, A123359.
Sequence in context: A109564 A188008 A145755 * A156425 A093787 A175749
Adjacent sequences: A159622 A159623 A159624 * A159626 A159627 A159628


KEYWORD

hard,nonn


AUTHOR

David Broadhurst, Apr 17 2009


EXTENSIONS

a(18) from Giovanni Resta, Apr 09 2014


STATUS

approved



