login
A115993
Size |S| of the largest subset S of {0,1}^n whose measure m(S) is <= 2^n, where m is the additive measure defined on each element x of S by m({x}) = 2^k(x), where k(x) is the number of non-null coordinates of x.
2
1, 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, 19, 32, 52, 89, 158, 262, 426, 725, 1287, 2154, 3498, 5931, 10485, 17940, 28965, 48813, 85775, 150923, 241735, 404082, 704598, 1275594, 2031915, 3363953, 5812312, 10438620, 17194101, 28160524, 48156310, 85702564
OFFSET
0,3
COMMENTS
This is an upper bound to sequence A115992; I do not know whether the two sequences are equal. The proof goes by projecting a queen (see definition of A115992), i.e. an element q of {0,1,2}^n, to the element p(q) of {0,1}^n obtained by substituting 0 for 2. Let also D(q) = { q' in {0,2}^n | if q_i <> 1 then q'_i = q_i }; then |D(q)| = m(p(q)). Two queens q and q' attack each other if and only if either p(q)=p(q') or D(q) and D(q') meet. Conclusion left to the reader.
EXAMPLE
a(4)=6=|S| with S containing (0,0,0,0) (of measure 1), plus the 4 permutations of (1,0,0,0) (each of measure 2), plus (1,1,0,0) (of measure 4). Total measure of S is 1+4*2+4=13, while {0,1}^4 itself has measure 16 and all remaining elements of {0,1} have measure >= 4 so none of them can complete S.
PROG
(Python)
def q3ub(n):
sum = 0;
vlm = 2**n; # 2 to the n-th power
combi = 1; # combinatorial coefficient (n k)
for k in range(n+1): # for k := 0 to n
c = min(combi, vlm);
sum = sum + c;
vlm = vlm - c;
vlm = vlm // 2; # integer division, result is truncated
combi = (combi * (n-k)) // (k+1) # division is exact
#end for k
return sum
CROSSREFS
Cf. A115992 (of which this is an easier upper bound).
Sequence in context: A140443 A224957 A115992 * A136424 A116732 A367736
KEYWORD
easy,nonn
AUTHOR
Frederic van der Plancke (fplancke(AT)hotmail.com), Feb 10 2006
STATUS
approved