|
|
A103271
|
|
a(n) = (prime(n)+prime(n+1)) mod 4.
|
|
2
|
|
|
1, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 2, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 2, 2, 0, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)
|
|
|
OFFSET
|
1,4
|
|
COMMENTS
|
The number of 2's among the first N terms are: count(10^3) = 381, count (10^4) = 4137, count(10^5) = 42638, count(10^6) = 437423, count(10^7) = 4448503. - M. F. Hasler, Apr 27 2016
In terms of vectors a = (p(n),p(n+1)) mod 4, as considered in the preprint arxiv:1603.03720, the 2's group together the cases a = (1,1) and (3,3) and 0's cumulate cases (1,3) and (3,1). Assuming that the two subcases of each case have roughly the same probabilities, the above counts (i.e., percentage of 44.5% : 55.5% at 10^7) are compatible with the data in the 2nd table on bottom of p.14 where respective percentages vary from 44.8% : 55.1% (at 10^10) to 46% : 54% (at 10^12). I found that at p(n) ~ 10^80, the percentages become closer than 49% : 51%. - M. F. Hasler, May 12 2016
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
FORMULA
|
|
|
MAPLE
|
seq(ithprime(n)+ithprime(n+1) mod 4, n=1..150); # Emeric Deutsch, May 31 2005
|
|
MATHEMATICA
|
|
|
PROG
|
(PARI) a(n) = (prime(n) + prime(n+1)) % 4; \\ Michel Marcus, Apr 14 2016
|
|
CROSSREFS
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
nonn
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
|
EXTENSIONS
|
|
|
STATUS
|
approved
|
|
|
|