

A100476


a(1)=a(2)=a(3)=a(4)=1; for n > 4: a(n) = A000720(a(n1)+a(n2)+a(n3)+a(n4)).


0



1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 16, 18, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21, 22, 23, 23, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24, 24
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)



OFFSET

1,5


COMMENTS

For n > 29 we have a(n) = 24. Starting with other values of a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4) what behaviors are possible? The sequence is in any case bounded. If for some k a(k)+a(k+1)+a(k+2)+a(k+3) > 400, then a(k+4) is smaller than the average of a(k),a(k+1), a(k+2) and a(k+3), which means that the sequence will always stick at a single integer after some point or go into a loop. Are there values a(1), a(2), a(3), a(4) such that the sequence would indeed exhibit cyclic behavior?


LINKS

Table of n, a(n) for n=1..73.
Index entries for linear recurrences with constant coefficients, signature (1).


EXAMPLE

a(6) = A000720(a(2)+a(3)+a(4)+a(5)) = A000720(5) = 3.


MATHEMATICA

a = {1, 1, 1, 1}; Do[ AppendTo[a, PrimePi[a[[ 1]]+a[[ 2]]+a[[ 3]]+a[[ 4]]]], {70}]; a
RecurrenceTable[{a[1]==a[2]==a[3]==a[4]==1, a[n]==PrimePi[a[n1]+ a[n2]+ a[n3]+a[n4]]}, a[n], {n, 80}] (* Harvey P. Dale, Sep 19 2011 *)


CROSSREFS

Cf. A000720.
Sequence in context: A245092 A092601 A162906 * A290083 A248517 A007896
Adjacent sequences: A100473 A100474 A100475 * A100477 A100478 A100479


KEYWORD

easy,nonn


AUTHOR

Jonathan Vos Post, Nov 22 2004


EXTENSIONS

Edited by Stefan Steinerberger, Aug 08 2007


STATUS

approved



