

A058986


Sorting by prefix reversal (or "flipping pancakes"). You can only reverse segments that include the initial term of the current permutation; a(n) is the number of reversals that are needed to transform an arbitrary permutation of n letters to the identity permutation.


7



0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
(list;
graph;
refs;
listen;
history;
text;
internal format)



OFFSET

1,3


COMMENTS

"The chef in our place is sloppy and when he prepares a stack of pancakes they come out all different sizes. Therefore when I deliver them to a customer, on the way to the table I rearrange them (so that the smallest winds up on top and so on, down to the largest at the bottom) by grabbing several from the top and flipping them over, repeating this (varying the number I flip) as many times as necessary. If there are n pancakes, what is the maximum number of flips (as a function a(n) of n) that I will ever have to use to rearrange them?" [Dweighter]
J. K. McLean (jkmclean(AT)webone.com.au): If the worst case for n pancakes is x flips, then the worst case for n + 1 pancakes can be no greater than x + 2 flips. Getting the n + 1 pancake to the bottom of the pile will require 0, 1 or 2 flips, after which you can sort the n remaining pancakes in at most x flips.
Comments based on email message from Brian Hayes, Oct 10 2007: (Start)
We are interested in the diameter of the graph where the vertices are all possible permutations of n elements and an edge connects p(i) and p(j) if some allowed reversal transforms p(i) into p(j).
There are at least two dimensions to consider in describing the various sortingbyreversal problems: (a), Are the elements of the sequence signed or unsigned? and (b), Are we constrained to work only from one end of the sequence?
The standard pancake problem has unsigned elements and allows moves only from the top of the stack; the diameter is given by the present sequence.
The "burntpancake" problem has signed elements and allows moves only from the top of the stack. This is sequence A078941 (and also A078942).
The biologicallyinspired sorting problems I was writing about in the Amer. Scientist 2007 column dispense with the oneendonly constraint. You're allowed to reverse any segment of contiguous elements, anywhere in the permutation. For the unsigned case, a(n) = n1 (cf. Kececioglu and Sankoff).
Finally there is the signed case without the oneend constraint. This was the main subject of my column and corresponds to sequence A131209. (End)
Brian Goodwin (brian_goodwin(AT)yahoo.com), Aug 22 2005, comments that the terms so far match the beginning of the following triangle:
....................0
....................1
.................3..4..5
..............7..8..9.10.11
..........13.14.15.16.17.18.19
.......21.22.23.24.25.26.27.28.29
....31.32....
Is this a coincidence? Answer from Mikola Lysenko (mclysenk(AT)mtu.edu), Dec 09 2006: Unfortunately, Yes! That triangular sequence has the closed form: a(n) = (n  1) + floor(sqrt(n  2)). However, Gates and Papadimitrou establish a lower bound on the pancake sequence of at least 17n / 16. For sufficiently large n, this is always larger than the triangle.
Marc Lebrun writes that in 1975 he was involved with a group called "People's Computer Company" and among the many early computer games they created and popularized was one called "Reverse", which we published in our newspaper. See link.


REFERENCES

Shogo Asai, Yuusuke Kounoike, Yuji Shinano and Keiichi Kaneko, Computing the Diameter of 17Pancake Graph Using a PC Cluster, Proc. EuroPar 2006, LNCS 4128, pp. 11141124, 2006 Springer Verlag
Bergeron, Anne and Francois Strasbourg. 2001. Experiments in computing sequences of reversals. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithms in Bioinformatics, pp. 164174. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.
Caprara, Alberto. 1997. Sorting by reversals is difficult. Proceedings of RECOMB '97: The First International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 7583. New York: ACM Press.
J. J. Chew, III (jjchew(AT)math.utoronto.ca), personal communication, Jan 15 and Feb 08 2001, computed a(10)  a(13).
E. Györi and G. Turán, Stack of pancakes, Studia Sci. Math. Hungar., 13 (1978), 133137.
Kececioglu, J. D. and D. Sankoff. 1995. Exact and approximation algorithms for sorting by reversal, with application to genome rearrangement. Algorithmica 13:180210.
Yuusuke Kounoike, Keiichi Kaneko and Yuji Shinano, Computing the Diameters of 14 and 15pancake Graphs, Proc. International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Networks(ISPAN 2005), pp. 490495.
Tannier, Eric and MarieFrance Sagot. 2004. Sorting by reversals in subquadratic time. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, pp. 113. Berlin: SpringerVerlag.


LINKS

Table of n, a(n) for n=1..17.
Vineet Bafna and Pavel Pevzner, Genome rearrangements and sorting by reversals, SIAM Journal on Computing 25:272289 (1996).
Anne Bergeron, A very elementary presentation of the HannenhalliPevzner theory, Discrete Applied Mathematics 146:134145 (2005).
Laurent Bulteau, Guillaume Fertin, Irena Rusu, Pancake Flipping is Hard, arXiv:1111.0434 [cs.CC], Nov 10, 2011.
B. Chitturi, W. Fahle, Z. Meng, L. Morales, C. O. Shields, I. H. Sudborough and W. Voit, An (18/11)n upper bound for sorting by prefix reversals, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 410 (2009), no. 36, 33723390.
Harry Dweighter ["Harried Waiter", pseudonym of Jacob E Goodman], Problem E2569, Amer. Math. Monthly, 82 (1975), 1010. Comments by M. R. Garey, D. S. Johnson and S. Lin, loc. cit. 84 (1977), 296.
W. H. Gates and C. H. Padadimitriou, Bounds for sorting by prefix reversal, Discrete Math. 27 (1979), 4757.
Sridhar Hannenhalli and Pavel A. Pevzner, Transforming cabbage into turnip: polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals, Journal of the ACM 48:127 (1999).
Brian Hayes, Computing Science: Sorting out the genome, Amer. Scientist, 95 (2007), 386391.
M. H. Heydari and I. Hal Sudborough, On the diameter of the pancake network,J. Algorithms 25 (1997) no 1, 6794
Marc Lebrun et al., See under V1N5
Ed Pegg, Jr., Pancakes
Ivars Peterson, Pancake Sorting.
Ivars Peterson, Improved Pancake Sorting
J. Sawada, A. Williams, Successor rules for flipping pancakes and burnt pancakes, Preprint 2015; Theoretical Computer Science, Volume 609, Part 1, Jan 04 2016, Pages 6075.
Simon Singh, Flipping pancakes with mathematics, Blog Posting, Nov 14 2013. [States that a(18)=20, a(19)=22]
N. J. A. Sloane, My favorite integer sequences, in Sequences and their Applications (Proceedings of SETA '98).
Katie Steckles and Brady Haran, Pancake Numbers, Numberphile video (2017)
Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics, Pancake Sorting
Douglas B. West, The Pancake Problems (1975, 1979, 1973)
Index entries for sequences related to sorting


FORMULA

It is known that a(n) >= n+1 for n >= 6, a(n) >= 17n/16 if n is a multiple of 16 (so a(32) >= 34) and a(n) <= (5n+5)/3.
There is an improved asymptotic upper bound of (18/11)n + O(1) for the number of prefix reversals to sort permutations of length n given in the Chitturi et al. paper.  Ivan Hal Sudborough (hal_sud(AT)yahoo.com), Jul 02 2008


EXAMPLE

For n = 3, the stack of pancakes with radii (1, 3, 2) requires a(3) = 3 flips to sort: Starting with (1, 3, 2), flip the top two pancakes to get (3, 1, 2), then flip the entire stack to get (2, 1, 3), then flip the top two pancakes again to get (1, 2, 3).


CROSSREFS

Cf. A067607, A078941, A078942.
Sequence in context: A296095 A075748 A039177 * A184431 A078358 A175968
Adjacent sequences: A058983 A058984 A058985 * A058987 A058988 A058989


KEYWORD

nonn,nice,hard


AUTHOR

N. J. A. Sloane, Jan 17 2001, Oct 12 2007


EXTENSIONS

Typo in value for a(5) corrected by Ed Pegg Jr, Jan 02 2002
a(14)a(17) from Ivan Hal Sudborough (hal_sud(AT)yahoo.com), Jul 02 2008. The new upper bounds for n = 14, 15, 16 and 17 are found in the articles by Asai et al. and Kounoike et al.
Simon Singh's blog gives values for a(18) and a(19). It is not clear if these have been proved to be correct.  N. J. A. Sloane, Dec 11 2013


STATUS

approved



